However for HK guns it is pretty much all there is, especially if you want an MP-5 type gun. And if you want a version of the Colt 9mm AR machine gun, the auto sear route is more plentiful than the few registered receiver conversions, and the even fewer factory Colt guns, as the model was introduced (1985) right around the same time as the 1986 ban. And in general the sear or other registered part is cheaper to buy than the same gun as a registered receiver, both because you aren’t getting a gun also, and because it is less desirable. However you may find that due to the escalating value of the semi-auto host guns, the conversion part already installed in a host gun may cost as much as a registered receiver conversion of the same gun, like an IMI semi-auto UZI with a registered bolt installed versus a registered receiver UZI conversion. It pays to shop around.
–
Pro Ears Pro 300 – Hearing Protection
- Preset at 15 decibels of amplification for operation in a continuously noisy environment
- No high frequency filtering to help those with high frequency hearing loss
- Highly versatile cup – multi-purpose design
- Hearing protection reviews consistently rate the Pro 300 as a best value
- Available with behind-the-headband for use with full brim hats at total weight of 7.7 oz
# NRR 26
# Weight: 9.1 oz
# Three year warranty
The Pro Series Advantage is incredible performance and price.
You do not have to be a competitive shooter or hunting fanatic to appreciate the advantage of Pro Ears. The Pro Series will increase the enjoyment and improve the performance for the hunting or shooting enthusiast whose occasional outing is as important to them as the national championships are to the competitive shooter. The natural sound of the Pro Series is almost as good as the Gold Series and is better than any other active hearing enhancement product on the market. The biggest difference in sound between the Pro Series and Gold Series is a longer attack time of 5.5 milliseconds versus 1.5 milliseconds for the Gold Series.
Great sound, fewer features, lower price. The Pro Series does not have all the features that come standard with the 8 bit microprocessor on the Gold Series but they do offer great sound, real comfort and effective sound attenuation. The Pro Series offers industry leading DLSC
If a gun has rifled barrel(s) of less than 16″, and it has never had a shoulder stock it would be a pistol, unless it either has no grip at an angle to the bore, or if it has more than one grip. ATF has made the questionable decision that a handgun with more than one grip is an AOW. This is based on the gun a) being concealable on the person, and b) not meeting the definition of a “pistol” in the regulations promulgated under the NFA, since they say a pistol has a single grip at an angle to the bore. However, at least one federal court has decided that if the grip is added later, the gun is not “originally designed” to be fired by holding in more than one grip, and thus putting a second grip on a pistol does not make it an AOW. Whether ATF will regard the decision as binding beyond that case is unknown, I would doubt it. The case is U.S. v. Davis, Crim No. 8:93-106 (S.C. 1993) (Report of Magistrate, June 21, 1993). By the same token in mid 1996, ATF decided that “wallet” holsters for small guns, from which the gun could be fired, somehow are AOW’s. This would affect, for example, the North American Arms mini-revolver and the wallet holster NAA sold for the gun, as an accessory. ATF seems to be thinking that the grip has disappeared, and thus it fits into the first category. This strikes me as bizarre and stupid, and I suspect the courts will have their shot at it, given how common the wallet holsters are. What if you put the gun in a purse, from which it can be fired? A folded up newspaper? How are those different than a wallet holster?
–
Untitled Document [www.tank-tender.com]
Container & ID tag close-ups . Designed for the truck
Tank-Tender for SCBA and SCUBA Tanks: Oxygen Tank Storage …
Oxygen Tank-Tender 8 cylinders Code: OxygenTT Price: $449.95 Quantity in Basket: none
Tank-Tender for SCBA and SCUBA Tanks: Carbon Fiber Scuba Tank Storage
SCUBA Tank-Tender Four cylinders Code: SCUBA-TT4c Price: $449.95 Quantity in Basket: none
Tank-Tender for SCBA and SCUBA Tanks: Luxfer SCUBA Cylinder Storage
SCUBA Tank-Tender Four cylinders Code: SCUBA-TT4c Price: $449.95 Quantity in Basket: none
SCOTT AIR PAKs Storage & Protection
SCOTT AIR PAKs Storage & Protection . FEMA, USAR, WMD, HAZMAT, Fire and Rescue teams, this is what you’ve been looking for!
Tank-Tender for SCBA and SCUBA Tanks: SCUBA Tank-Tender Four …
SCUBA Tank-Tender Four cylinders : Quantity in Basket: None Code: SCUBA-TT4c Price: $449.95
Tank-Tender for SCBA and SCUBA Tanks: Tank-Tender
Tank-Tender 5 cylinders – 30 min 4500 psi Code: TT5c Price: $449.95 Quantity in Basket: none
Oxygen Tanks at Oxygen Tanks & Scuba Tanks
FEMA USAR DMAT O2 Scott airpaks Scott Airpacks Fire rescue, Self contained breathing apparatus
Oxygen Tank Storage
Oxygen Tank Storage. FEMA, USAR, WMD, HAZMAT, Fire and Rescue teams, this is what you’ve been looking for!
Therefore, if one has a semi-auto HK-91, and an HK-93 converted with an auto sear, and having a barrel less than 16 inches, one may not remove the sear from the HK-93 and put it on the HK-91. That would leave the semi-auto pack from the HK-91, and the receiver/barrel combination from the HK-93; a set of parts for assembling a rifle, and said rifle would have a short barrel, and further not be registered. I think that if one disposed of all trigger packs one had, except the one the sear was in, one could legally swap it between the rifles, without having to register the HK-93 as a SBR. The leftover HK-93 receiver and barrel setup would not be capable of firing a shot, with the parts in the possession of the owner, except with the sear converted pack, and using that on it would be OK. HOWEVER, I think ATF would disagree, would probably claim the resulting half of a gun was an “unservicable” short rifle or some other non- sense, and would prosecute should such an arrangement be attempted. If someone is serious about doing this, they need to ask Technology Branch if they will go along with the reasoning outlined. If they didn’t, one would need to sue, rather than have to fight it in a criminal, rather than civil, context.
–
Weaver AR-15 Single Rail Carry Handle Mount System
DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES
–
Citadel99 June 6, 2004, 08:58 AM So, I’m wanting to get an optic for my M4gery. I also plan on strapping it to my M4 when I head off to Iraq this fall. So ruggedness, battery life, and all those little things that go hand in hand with having a weapon on your person 24/7/365 come in to play. I’m pretty much set on one of these two options. I’ve used an Aimpoint and really it. Never had the chance to use the EOTech, though… Thanks in advance, Mark dave3006 June 6, 2004, 09:23 AM I bought the EOtech and returned it. I own the Aimpoint Comp ML2. The EOtech was too big. It was like having a big screen TV mounted to my gun. The controls were slow and not intuitive. I did not like the busy circle/dot reticle. Batteries are really not an issue. You can leave the Aimpoint on for a year. greenmountaingear June 6, 2004, 09:59 AM EO TECH hands down. I dumped my Aimpoint shortly after buying a 552 EOtech . Liked the EO some much that I became a dist/dealer for them! Wouldn’t use anything else now. Rev.F 552′s have about 1000+hrs on a couple “AA”‘s. Never had any issues with any model I’ve owned and could acquire my targets far faster than with the aimpoint. Comes down to what works for you though 
Ever board has at least 6 of these threads, 120pages long…EO vs. Aimpoint. LOL! If ya ever need an EO or info, drop me a line! GMG Hutch June 6, 2004, 10:27 AM Well, glad you two guys cleared that up for me!!! Somebody else wade in and break the tie. N3rday June 6, 2004, 12:39 PM http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=18&t=164971 This topic has known to start flame wars…its all just personal preference. You might buy an EOtech, fall in love with it, and then finally use an Aimpoint and discover you like it better. To each his own. Just see if you can find some folks who would let you shoot theirs. MaceWindu June 6, 2004, 02:47 PM I like the Eotech….cheap and easily replaced batteries, great HUD, VERY accurate. Here is the EOtech 552 on top of my Custom mini…. http://img62.photobucket.com/albums/v188/Triggerman/ASIside001.bmp http://img62.photobucket.com/albums/v188/Triggerman/ASItarget001.bmp That is a dime for reference @ 80yrds. There are 3 separate groups there….EoTech gets my vote…. MaceWindu Blackhawk 6 June 6, 2004, 07:46 PM The EOtech is a good sight but of the two, has significantly more reliability issues. The Aimpoint is an excellent sight and holds up well under the rigors of military use. My recommendation is to go with the M-68. 444 June 6, 2004, 09:35 PM This question often inspires more than a few emotional responses. I prefer the Aimpoint. I have never owned an Eotech, but one of my best friends has one, so I am pretty familiar with it. I have shot his enough to know that I like mine better. More than one person in the know agrees with me. For example: Pat Rogers considers the Aimpoint to be clearly superior. warrior23 June 6, 2004, 10:29 PM Lets just say you cant go wrong with either site.Both are great sites my EOtech I feel is a little quicker in CQB,My Aimpoint works better for me at longer distances.So do what I did and buy Both! Rocko June 7, 2004, 12:03 PM I have both the EOtech 511 and the Aimpoint Comp M. While I like both, I feel that the EOtech is basically more advanced – at least from a user perspective if not a technical perspective. While the EOtech is a bigger, this also allows for a greater FOV – I don’t really even notice the housing of the EOtech as I do the tube on the aimpoint. From a total cost perspective on a flattop AR, the EOtech is also almost always going to win, as you don’t need to purchase a separate mount for it. The battery life issue was addressed in revision F, but I believe these are in short supply right now, which probably won’t change anytime soon. EOtech was just awarded a large contract for the SOPMOD2 project (along with Eclan and Trijicon) so most new production will likely be focused on that. Interestingly, Aimpoint, was NOT awarded part of that contract – reinforcing my idea that while both are good, the EOtech is the “new” while Aimpoint the “old”. Rocko
DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES
–
STAR-CX-EBR
Samson Tactical Accessory Rail System
AR-15 Carbine Length Free Floating Rail System
click to enlarge
The STAR-CX-EBR-EBR is a free floating carbine length rail system that fits over the AR-15 front sight bases. The CX-EBR has a extended 10 bottom rail for maximum rail space..
Speculations:
- Winged Clamp To Prevent Barrel Net Rotation
- Forms Continuous Top Rail
***Requires some work on bottom of FSB ****
Weapons that fit the first category above are commonly called gadget guns; pen guns, stapler guns, cane guns, alarm clock guns, flashlight guns, the list of objects is pretty long. A few have been removed from the scope of the law because their collector status makes them unlikely to be misused; original Nazi belt buckle guns for example. See the C&R list for these.
–
Vortex Optics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Vortex Optics Type Corporation Industry Optical Imaging Founded Middleton, Wisconsin, USA, 2004 Founder(s) Daniel C. Hamilton Headquarters Middleton, Wisconsin, USA Products Precision binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, and other optical instruments. Employees Approx. 40 Website Vortex Optics Vortex Optics is an American company developing optics for hunting, bird watching, wildlife watching, outdoor recreational sports, and law enforcement. Vortex products include binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, and other optical equipment. Contents [hide] * 1 History * 2 Products * 3 References * 4 External links [edit] History Vortex Optics is a DBA of Sheltered Wings, Inc., which was incorporated in the State of Wisconsin in 1989. Sheltered Wings, Inc. DBA Vortex Optics began in 2004. [edit] Products Vortex Optics is based in Middleton, Wisconsin and currently produces binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, and related accessories.
A lost or stolen NFA firearm
A lost or stolen NFA firearm can be a real problem. It can be a very expensive loss, as well as endangering the continued lawfulness of owning NFA firearms, both at a state and federal level. Contrary to what you might hear, NFA firearms, machine guns and silencers in particular, are very rare in crime. A significant source of such weapons in crime is stolen NFA firearms, from law enforcement, the military and civilian collectors. A crime spree with a stolen NFA firearm can lead to restrictive state or local legislation, as well as local law enforcement refusing to continue providing the law enforcement certification needed for transfers to individuals. Safeguarding NFA firearms is not required, but seems to me to be extremely prudent, both to preserve the firearm, as well as its continued legal ownership. Reporting the theft of an NFA weapon to law enforcement is the only way to even have a chance at recovering the gun, and preventing its use (or further use) in crime. I think reporting its theft is a good idea. Below is what is required, as opposed to what is a good idea.
–
Magpull CTR Extended Rubber Butt-Pad, 0.55
The Extended Rubber Butt-Pad, 0.55 comes standard with the CTR
ATF Forms and Descriptions, by Category and Number
This information is correct as of 20 February 1995; compilation is copyright (c) 1995 by Trenton J. Grale. Permission is granted herein to copy and distribute this document, in whole or in part, with attribution, for noncommercial and nongovernmental use only.
–
Rifle Basix Savage SAV-R
Savage Rimfire Rifles & Striker Pistols
Models: 501, 502, & 503, Mark I & II, Model 93
.22′s & .22 Magnum – New .17 HMR
* SAV-R will not fit or replace 2006 bolt action rimfire models with AccuTrigger
# Josh the Impaler purchases a Remington 1100 on July 4, 1994 in order to celebrate Independence Day. A year later, he decides that he would like a pistol grip and folding stock added to make it a better home defense gun. Is this legal? No. The shotgun was complete before The Date, but it was not a SAW before the date, and therefore cannot be modified to a SAW after The Date.
–
The Romanian PSL Sniper rifle – A collector’s perspective
As a shooter, retailer, collector and sometimes gun writer, I am always fascinated by historically interesting rifles. The SVD Dragunov from the former Soviet Union is one …
Killing shot made at distance of 2,430 metres
Killing shot made at distance of 2,430 metres Stephen Thorne Canadian Press A world-record killing shot by a Canadian sniper detachment in Afghanistan could never have been …
Remington Trigger Adjustments
In the U.S.A., we live in a litigious society, and for those of you who live in Rio Linda, that means fools will do really stupid crap, and then sue someone else, because “It’s …
.408 CheyTac – Trip Report, Shooters’ Observations and Test Results
Date: 4/26/2001 Re: Trip Report, Shooters Observations and Test Results / .408 CheyTaC. This report is a wrap-up of the test shoot conducted at South Creek Flats, Idaho.
Accuracy Facts – .308 Winchester versus .30-06 Springfield
Seems to me that any time there’s more metal contacting the bullet, the greater [the] chance that more variables come into play. Besides, folks who shoot highpower rifles the …
Mil-dots and Minutes-of-angle – From a Technical Perspective
If you’ve always wondered what those little dots are for on a military rifle scope’s reticle (cross-hairs), then look no further. I hope to explain, in a clear and concise …
